Featured videos: language, literacy, writing

Reading Together

Perusall logoWe’ll use Perusall to annotate and read together. Link here to Perusall. Instructions for joining on the Assignments page.

Calendar: link here

Category: Uncategorized

A Grass from the Past

A Grass from the Past

4/15/17

 

After going to conversation hour at the ESL center, dying eggs with all the amazing people who work there and who visit to work on their conversation I had the opportunity to chat with Johnny Yang a little bit about this project. He’s going to let us take over next friday to run the workshop, and things are really starting to shape up.

In the last week I’ve had conversations with Saundra Wright, Matt Brown, and together Allison and I had the opportunity to chat with Ela Thurgood to hear their thoughts about our project and the ways in which we might go through with it.

Saundra Wright recommended that we contact folks running the ENGL 130 classes including Seneca and Dalton so that we can advertise our event leading up to Friday so that we can try and get some good attendance. So far I’ve chatted with Dalton face to face, but I have yet to reach out to Seneca or any of the other 130 teachers. So this is part of my to-do list today before work if at all possible.

Matt Brown spent an hour chatting with me about Walt Whitman and the ways in which his approach to the 1855 edition of Leaves of Grass might be Multimodal. There’s an image of Walt Whitman further down above the entry for April 8th. This is the first image you would have seen of the poet if you picked up a copy of the self-published edition of Leaves of Grass published in 1855. What’s interesting is that Whitman does’t always present himself this way, and that potentially the decision to present himself as an “everyday farmer sort” was actually more rhetorical in nature than a first glance might glean.

Whitman is trying to make a statement about how this volume of poetry is not just for the Elite, but for everybody, including you.

So he’s using technology to subvert a tradition of poetry that has existed in America since its inception, and that has roots in Europe.

Multimodality in ENGL 431 is about challenging or updating the tradition of the Essay, and it seems to me their goals and messages run parallel to each other, and I wonder if a message similar to this existed at the birth of writing, or the birth of the printing press, or the telegraph, etc.. perhaps this technological bridge and the questions and frustrations that arise because of it are things we as a species are more familiar with than we realize having access to only a single lifetime.

Johnny the special events coordinator at the ESL Recourse Center told me I could make a poster for the event, so I found a template on my phone, and in less than 10 minutes had a flyer that looked pretty good actually. I have no artistic skills, so all the work the app makers did to make the process easy and user friendly is very much appreciated.

Finding Whitman Poster Big

After sending the poster to Johnny for approval he had me change the text from ESL Center to ESL Resource Center, and so far this is the final product.

What’s left to do after this leading up to friday is schedule a time to talk with Kim Jaxon and Chris Fosen about how to turn this whole thing into a “multimodal essay,” and to see if they can help me connect Walt Whitman’s work to the spirit of multimodality a little more clearly.

And of course there is the workshop itself, and two separate linguistics tests this week… which is scary to be honest.

Wish us luck,

David

 

 

4/13/17

https://youtu.be/FAda8O7nPVo

So I’m starting to get this project narrowed down in my head. I feel like I’ve got traction, and I know who I want to talk to next.

I recorded this journal entry before work while it was hailing outside, and posted it on break before chowing down…. so tech allows you to do some pretty crazy things.

However, if this is supposed to be the kind of document that is both multimodal and does the kind of work an academic essay would do, it’s possible that things would become a little more formalized in the future. That being said, since part of this project is about documenting the whole processs being honest with the reality of how everything is coming together seems like a fair and justifiable move.

 

Happy Thursday,

David

 

 

 

 

Saturday 4/8/2017

I’ve reread Karen Karbiener’s introduction to the Barnes and Noble edition of Leaves of Grass; Walt Whitman’s most famous and most meticulously revised work, and I’ve asked her a few questions about Walt Whitman and his relationship with the cutting edge technologies of his day. My hypothesis is that Walt Whitman’s understanding of texts and circulation as well as of audience and purpose will place a few of Whitman’s actions and thoughts in the realm of Multimodal-equivalent.

In 2017 we talk about multimodality one way, but in the mid 19th century maybe Whitman would have used a similar term were it in their lexicon.

I hope to hear from her, but there’s no guarantees.

I’ve been thinking more about compiling pieces of the project into a separate blog that we’d turn in when the project is due. It could have a separate page for both a kind of thesis statement, perhaps an abstract if we felt we needed it, and more important a separate page for works cited information.

i have yet to ask Allison if she likes this part of the idea, but here’s hoping!

leaf II has been added tonight.

*Also if you want to see the original post scroll down.

**Will add more and newer updates we go.

https://youtu.be/LgnMGGWgLBM

 

 

Thursday 4/6/2017

For the final Multimodality project I’m upset that I can’t think of anything more technically savvy than a series of Youtube videos connected by theme and title, but that’s where I am. From what I understand this project either has to use multimodal techniques to design something that takes the place of a traditional academic text, or it has to be a project that explores the function of multimodality in academia with the purpose of trying to discover at least one way in which multimodality could be productive within the boundaries of a semester long class. I may have embellished this project a bit, but this is an angle that makes sense to me.

Now this is the part where I admit I’m not really the most technically savvy guy in the world, but that I’m willing to learn. On wednesday we were talking about what kinds of ways you might grade or evaluate a multimodal kind of text, and to me this seems like a very hard thing to do. This class has spent a lot of time challenging formulaic writing, and it seems to me that the urge to formalize and confine multimodal approaches to the creation of academic texts would be counter productive, and we as a discipline would derive all the same problems we see currently in the teaching of formulaic writing that we see today.

So what I think this will be is an exploration of Multimodality through the genre of a typical college paper like we’ve all seen a hundred times. In other places in the school I have heard my fellow English majors lament the difficulty of producing a paper in their Shakespeare or Chaucer classes that is both well researched and ‘in dialogue’ with the scholarship on the subject that has come before.

Texts being ‘in dialogue’ with other texts that have come before, and perhaps even being in dialogue with future, unwritten, and even yet-unthought-of texts is something I’ve run into time and time again. When Matt Brown introduced my class to Walt Whitman last semester this was one of the main ideas he posited; that Walt Whitman’s 1855 edition of Leaves of Grass was in dialogue with future readers, with the American people as well as with other writers. At the end of Song of Myself Walt Whitman actually addresses the reader from the page when he writes, “Listener up there!”

The wordslinger was breaking a lot of conventions by doing that. In so many ways he dedicated his life to defying convention whilst simultaneously delivering true-depth with every attempt. Yes I may be a little biased. The point is Walt was anything but formulaic, and his message seems to be simpatico with the thesis of our class. So I want to explore the life and work of Walt Whitman through Multimodality. Which is my attempt at making Multimodality do the kind of work that a traditional paper might do.

This would be my half of the project.

On the other hand Allison Clark has expressed the desire to somehow incorporate our work at the ESL center into our project. Several times this semester she has reminded me, without trying to, that eventually we may have to teach these things to students in a classroom setting, and not only that, but we’re going to have to make these kinds of things useful to students. I fear that most often my approach to dealing with the subjects we’ve explored in this class have been from the vantage point of a student myself with the focus being how might these ideas be incorporated into my own process and style, where her’s has been more forward thinking in terms of how might these approaches benefit and alter academia as a whole (sorry if I’m putting words in your mouth Allison, but this is how you’ve helped me re-think these things over the semester). So it occurs to me that both might be good things to explore.

How can I personally (or we) use multimodality to do the kind of work that your standard academic text does, and how can I as a future teacher (or we as future teachers) use multimodality effectively in the classroom. It would make sense that our discipline would one day require aptitude in both of these areas to be considered effective teachers. And Frankly the prospect is a little daunting, but fear was made to be conquered right? So here comes the idea for the project:

  • Film the project from start to finish like a documentary. Film brainstorming sessions about the project so that we can document our process and they way in which the idea for whatever the final product turns out to be was born.
  • Speak with Saundra and Johnny and see if we can create a Walt Whitman workshop-ish thing that we can advertise and get people to show up for at an ESL conversation hour which takes place every Friday at 4 or 5 pm.
    • The workshop:
      • Walt Whitman uses a lot of “I am” statements In the 1855 version of Leaves of Grass”
      • “I am the mashed fireman with breastbone broken…”
      • “I am an old artillerist”
      • “I the poet of the body/ and I am the poet of the soul”
      • So I thought it would be cool to show people some good passages of Whitman, maybe paired with some images of nature and the diversity of people who live here and make of America (Humans of New York would be a cool resource) since diversity as an American theme seems to have a universal appeal in most cases.
      • After the little pre-activity we could ask the participants to come up with a few of their own “I am statements” then have them read their statements together.
      • The hope being that was as a group can arrange the statements to create our own leaves of grass styled poem with statements generated by our ESL students and tutors.
      • With their permission they will allow us to film it and use that for our final project.
  • I’d also like to film/document conversations with Allison about the project, and some of the conversations we will have to have with our profs to pull this workshop off.
  • Finally I think this whole thing might culminate in a short reflective essay that will be posted on a blog somewhere.
    • In fact, just brainstorming here, it might be good to put this whole thing on its own blog so that the blog itself could be the final academic text.

Allison this is mostly for you and Kim. I’d love to hear your thoughts, and if you have any questions or concerns please shoot me an email or give me a call.

-David

Walt Whitman, America^

I love this guy so much.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyH-3ac9Qy4

Beginning to document the process^

 

 

What in the world… Why am I up at one in the morning writing my assignment.

What in the world… Why am I up at one in the morning writing my assignment.

Unfortunately I cannot sleep and decided to write my assignment now instead of later in the morning. I honestly faced difficulties for this assignment, especially due to heavy workload that is often placed on students near the end of the semester. I am seriously annoyed and cannot deal with overload of work that is given to students; do instructors forget their academic experience in college and the stress students endure? Anyways, when I rhetorically think about Barron’s Pencils to Pixels, I start to reminisce on how new literacy technology is often not afforded to students when first created. An excerpt in the academic article that seemed relevant and powerful, is when he mentions, “Each new literacy technology begins with a restricted communications function and is available only to a small number of initiates … As costs decrease and the technology becomes better able to mimic more ordinary or familiar communications, a new literacy spreads across a population.” I often think that students are stifled or removed from accessing important technologies, especially in current academic institutions. Before transferring to Chico State, I reflect on how composition/academic essays were produced and the very ineffective methods that did not work or help my understanding on how to compose an essay. Rhetorically, I think about the rhetorical situation and how the assignments reflect an overview of how essays were composed before computers/digital media were created, and irrelevant to expanding new literacy practices.

I correlate this article to Shipka and how she mentions the importance of expanding multimodal assignments. The examples she used are relevant and demonstrate that composition can be produced in many formats. Also, I am very excited how rhetoric continues to play a major role in composition and how students approach composition. Ultimately, I believe that like new literacy practices/new methods of composition, students should not be forced to produce work that is reflective of previous methods of writing. Students should be able to compose various assignments with new digital media literacies, different writing formats, which potentially correlate with writing in the real world. I know that I am constantly struggling with my English Degree and how we are forced to emulate written academic articles, hindering students from expanding literacy practices within our own major and not emphasizing the importance of digital literacy. However, with this course, I aim to help students understand that composition is not only based on written text and there are various methods on how to compose an assignment.

Michael Scott Multi-Modality Comprehension

Michael Scott Multi-Modality Comprehension

It’s funny because a majority of us start our blogs off by saying something along the lines of… “I don’t really know what to talk about, but…” or “I’m not entirely sure what this means, but…” But I really really DON’T KNOW. I’m sitting here on the fourth floor of the library slowly trying to make sense of multi-modality and Shipka’s piece, but I’m at a loss of words. And honestly, I’m hoping that the more words I type, the clearer my understanding and what I’m trying to convey becomes. Yeah?

…And I was typing that little confusing, circular (?) introduction, I couldn’t stop thinking about this little nugget: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlKuohxl1so

So I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say multi-modality brings out my inner Michael Scott, and that I’m not the only one.

Part of me thinks multi-modality is such a “common sense” type of topic. Or, I don’t know. Maybe not entirely “common sense”, but I feel like once I watched the Kress videos, a light went off. I had one of those “AHA!” moments and everything he talked about–format, visuals, sounds, colors, texts–made sense. I think we’ve all inherently engaged in multi-modal components in either academia or any other literacy we engage in (and I would especially argue that we engage in more multi-modal components when we’re engaging in outside literacies and or things we don’t traditionally define as literacies). But, for whatever reason, we don’t teach multi-modality. I had never heard of multi-modality until this class. I’m a fourth year college student and this is the very first time I’m hearing about multi-modality? And, the only reason I’m learning about it is because I need this class for my TESOL certificate. So in this I see two divisions: one, teaching multi-modality to only those privileged enough to attend college (and that’s assuming every other university does in fact teach multi-modality) and two, teaching multi-modality to a select few in a select discipline(s). How radically different would our education system be if we not only taught what multi-modality is, but also incorporated those multi-modal components in classrooms? I think we would achieve a number of things through this incorporation, but two stick out to me the most: one, we would bridge the gap between students who learn in a more “traditional” sense and those who could and would achieve in a more inclusive, expansive (talking about literacies here!), and collaborative classroom (talking about the benefits of multi-modality here!)

Multi-modality isn’t just for the talented artists and creative minds out there. It’s literally an opportunity for each and every student to explore their interests, talents, and individuality in showcasing their understanding of any given topic. Multi-modality is inclusive, it’s expansive, it’s the new addition we need to our education system.

 

Image result for lightbulb moment

 

In another sense, I feel like I’ve only attained the surface level understanding of multi-modality. It’s so complex and yet so perfectly intertwined in every literacy. Right? I don’t know. How is multi-modality any different from expanding literacy practices and reading classroom literacies? What isn’t considered to be a multi-modal component? Okay, I’m starting to confuse myself again. No wonder studying multi-modality can be and is its own research area/emphasis!

 

Image result for lightbulb moment

 

I think something semi-worth noting here is that I felt mildly uncomfortable adding in the above images in my “sly” attempt at incorporating multi-modality. Is this because I don’t fully understand multi-modality or is it because I haven’t had enough practice in multi-modality to build up my confidence in it and explore its other components?

Welp. I really tried. I don’t know if I have a better understanding of multi-modality. A clearer one or a foggier one. I don’t know if it’s because I don’t fully understand multi-modality that I’m confused as to why people would be so against incorporating it into their classrooms or it’s because I’m not an English major? Is this common sense or am I minimizing it?

All in all, I am interested in pursuing this, especially as I hope to have my own TESOL classroom one day and want to make my curriculum as inclusive, achievable, and applicable as possible. I’m interested in applying all I’ve learned about expanding literacy practices (multiliteracy?), reading classroom literacy, and multi-modality (because really, aren’t they all intertwined and interdependent on each other?) into my classroom. Perhaps I’m just not up to date on the most radical educational shifts, but I hope that more and more teachers are empowered in these expansions of the classroom and curriculum to join me in creating that multi-modal classroom.

P.S. – I didn’t know how this fit but I’m really interested in the idea of modes. Specifically, how are TESOL classrooms affected by the idea that modes are socially created and accepted and thus, vary from culture to culture. Different cultures have different pools of knowledge, different signals… all dictated by daily cultural differences. Social environments influence the role multi-modality plays and also the modes that are used. And based on this, multi-modality can’t just encompass things like text, sounds, images, color, etc. It has to also include more personal anecdotes like experiences and cultural understanding.

  • ^^^ I think I have an idea for my multi-modal project? Diversity is really important to me. Inclusivity is also really important to me. And to be a bit more casual, but also serious: food is also really important to me. Would putting together a cookbook of different cultural dishes count as multi-modal? I could include images, colors, font changes… I mean, maybe it can be a digital cookbook type of thing? With sound? Or I can suggest songs to listen to for each dish to really experience the culture the food represents? This also speaks to the importance of experience and symbolism in multi-modality because at least in my family, cookbooks are sacred tales of culture and experiences passed down. They followed my family from Honduras to the United States (even with me to South Africa). They also follow the experiences of the women in my family from a time when traditional gender roles were more enforced to now. I don’t know. I got really excited thinking about this but I’m not entirely sure this would count as a multi-modal project? Let me know. I could be completely off track, as I tend to be.

 

 

@Myself: Why Did You Attempt to Do This???

@Myself: Why Did You Attempt to Do This???

I honestly don’t know what I was doing or what I was talking about. I don’t even know what possessed me to do a vlog. The video editing software I was using was giving me hell and even crashed once making me lose all my progress. Having to start over while being forced to listen to myself speak, is a special kind of hell that I don’t want to endure again anytime soon so I’ll probably be avoiding doing vlogs for a while.  I think all the trouble I was having with this vlog was the universe’s way of saying that I shouldn’t have done this but well it can’t be helped at this point. So it’s kind of a mess and I apologize for this disaster but here it is, I guess.

 

What Even Is Life Right Now?

What Even Is Life Right Now?

So, as  much as I enjoy creating blog posts for this class, I really didn’t want to do this one this week… I’m going to be very honest and say that I’m completely at a loss and I have no idea how to make sense of this multimodal stuff. All I know is that multimedia is a thing that deals with media and its creation. I’m not entirely sure either of how or what I am actually misunderstanding, or if its just the fact that I am disgustingly overwhelmed with this semester and I just want it to END.

Would it be bad if I ranted? I thought so.

So, I guess for this multimodal thing, I’ll be honest and say that I haven’t read Baron’s piece and I’ve only read bits of Shipka’s. I have a mountain of reading to do for one other class, but I suppose that isn’t my problem. I feel like reading for me since I began college has been a complete nightmare… I  never had this much trouble reading EVER until I started here at Chico state. It’s like I became illiterate overnight and whenever I read anything I read sooooo slow. I take probably 3 hours to read thirty pages and I cannot focus if my life depended on it. This strange issue has made it the absolute hardest for me this semester because reading…

I wasn’t going to rant but as a matter of fact, I did anyway.

Any way, so this multimodal business is interesting. In my times of photoshop and what I see happening with videos and media now these days, its incredible. I wish I was more attentive to all the changes that have been happening in the past 10 years, but it all happened so fast I couldn’t keep up. I love the idea of learning with different types of multimodal texts and modes because (especially for me) for people who just aren’t very good with the reading thing, I feel like using these tactics are exceptionally better to push out needed information and get it straight to the main point.

That is all I will say about this because I still have no clear sense…