Why a good book is a secret door

G+ Community

We will share most of our work in a Google+ Community. We can upload images, respond to each other’s ideas, and share links and artifacts here.

Calendar

Course calendar can be found above and HERE.

Author: jaurele

I'm from Eureka originally but I've been in Chico for 14 years now. You could call me a Chico transplant. I moved here out of high school to attend Chico State and stayed because I love the area (and met my awesome husband here). I completed the Literary Editing and Publishing Certification Program since I originally wanted to work in publishing, but I now plan to pursue my Masters in Library and Information Science. I love everything about books and finally figured out that I need to make sharing, preserving, and digging into them my life's work. I would prefer to run a children's library to help foster the love of reading for future generations; I look forward to seeing how this class may better prepare me for that challenge. I work full-time at Build.com and I spent 7+ years working for Barnes & Noble prior to that. I spend my spare time reading, catching up with friends and family, and taking road trips whenever possible.
Snow White Surprises and Male Gaze (Jaurele’s Blog Post 3)

Snow White Surprises and Male Gaze (Jaurele’s Blog Post 3)

It’s been a while since I last saw Disney’s Snow White but I think I remember most of it. This is probably why the Grimm’s version we read in the Tatar book was full of surprises for me. The first major difference I noticed is that Grimm’s version is much more brutal in the original story. In Grimm’s version the queen asks the huntsman for Snow White’s lungs and liver as proof of her death,  and then eats them (really the pig’s). In the Disney version she keeps just the heart in a box. I guess Disney didn’t want to include cannibalism in his first full length feature movie. (Good call, Disney.) Also, there is only one attempt on Snow White’s life in the movie, but in the Grimm’s version the queen has to come back 3 times. Plus it’s just a sleeping death in the movie, whereas the queen really wanted her dead in the Grimm’s version. The ending was also a big surprise when I read the Grimm’s version. The queen is killed by lighting in the movie, a natural phenomenon. This absolves Snow White and her prince husband since, in the Grimm’s version, she is forced to dance in hot iron shoes to her death. This tames the Disney version of the story a great deal.

In the movie the huntsman breaks down and confesses what he is meant to do, and begs for Snow White’s forgiveness. In the Grimm’s version she is the one who begs for her life and then decides to escape to the woods. She is no longer an active participant in her escape from the queen in the Disney version.

Another major difference I noticed is the presentation of the dwarves. Snow White found their house clean in Grimm’s version, but messy in the movie. This makes sense to me since it gives her more to do. In the Grimm’s version the dwarves could obviously take care of themselves. They invite Snow White to stay more out of kindness than need. Actually, there is nothing childlike about the dwarves in the original story. They seem to be capable adult dwarves. Disney gave them silly names and made them infantile in many ways, but I think it’s more fun that way. I also noticed that in the movie the prince already knew Snow White and was sad to find her dead, which is why he kissed her. In the book the prince is a stranger that kisses a dead girl he happens upon, which is pretty weird.

I have to say I never liked Snow White much. She’s annoyingly perfect and to me lacks personality. But the story is interesting in other ways. When I think of the theme of this story I keep coming back to the feminist male gaze theory. I know this was not the Grimm’s intended moral or message, but I can’t help but read fairy tales, and their modern equivalents, with a critical eye regarding gender roles. The concept first came to mind when I realized that the queen’s obsession with approval from a man trapped in a mirror drives the action of the story. She must kill Snow White in order to be found the fairest in the land, in his eyes, “or die trying”. The queen places beauty above all else. Not some intrinsic or character trait, but her outward appearance. Also, when Snow White finds herself at the dwarves’ cottage, in the original version, they invite her to stay mostly because they find her beautiful. In the book they are self-sufficient and already neat and tidy, so they didn’t really need a scullery maid. When Snow White is presumed dead and lying in her glass coffin (so that the dwarves could continue to gaze at her beautiful face even in death), she is saved because a stranger happens upon her and finds her beautiful. You can’t get more passive than dead, and she is once again saved by a man just looking at her. The Prince kisses her and they fall magically in love at first sight.

Riddle Me This: Bluebeard Edition (Jaurele’s Blog Post 2)

Riddle Me This: Bluebeard Edition (Jaurele’s Blog Post 2)

Guess the right tale if you can

Clues from the chosen one have been banned

 

Trails of peas and lentils I have not

Nor a sinister, cannibalistic plot

 

No frantic cleaning of tainted eggs

Nor piecing together sisters’ heads, arms, and legs

 

No fictitious dreams dramatically retold

Nor Lady Mary proving she’s “too bold”

 

No maidens drinking white, red, or yellow wine

Nor big reveals when sitting down to dine

 

There are no fiances hiding behind barrels or casks

Can you tell which version now, if I ask?

Jaurele Roberts, Binge Reader (Blog Post 1)

Jaurele Roberts, Binge Reader (Blog Post 1)

belle books
Hello again! I’m Jaurele Roberts, and if you’re curious I was named after Superman’s dad in the comics. I find that sometimes helps people remember my name. I’m from Eureka originally but I’ve been in Chico for 14 years now. You could call me a Chico transplant. I moved here out of high school to attend Chico State and stayed because I love the area (and met my awesome husband here). I completed the Literary Editing and Publishing Certification Program since I originally wanted to work in publishing, but I now plan to pursue my Masters in Library and Information Science. I love everything about books and finally figured out that I need to make sharing, preserving, and digging into them my life’s work. I would prefer to run a children’s library to help foster a love of reading for future generations and I look forward to seeing how this class may better prepare me for that challenge.

I work full-time at Build.com and I spent 7+ years as a bookseller for Barnes & Noble prior to that. I spend my spare time reading, playing with my niece and nephew, catching up with friends, and taking road trips with my husband whenever possible.

I’ve always thought of “a reader” as someone who reads for pleasure rather than out of obligation, whether for work or school. After some of our class discussion last week I realized I was also limiting that definition to readers of traditional sources like novels, poetry, and literary non-fiction. I see now that this is a narrow-minded take on literacy and I’ll be challenging my views to be more inclusive in this regard.

Since this is my first time back to school for several years I have been reading solely for pleasure. I’m basically a binge reader. I try to read a little bit each day and I typically have at least three books in progress at any given time: novels, biographies, history, science, basically anything that catches my eye. I switch back and forth based on what is interesting to me at the moment. If I’m busy and don’t make time to read for a while I find myself going through a book in one sitting, or in a few days if it’s meaty. I’ve taken a number of literature courses and I was always excited to get the reading list each semester. I didn’t love everything on the list but I was lead to some of my favorite books by branching out from the course requirements. I also worked in a bookstore for years and was exposed to great contemporary authors, which was a nice break from some of the more traditional class texts I was reading. The main difference between assigned and voluntary reading for me was forcing myself to slow down and read an assigned text with a very critical eye, whereas reading for pleasure was more casual.

In his article, “Why Johnny can never, ever read: The perpetual literacy crisis and student identity”, Bronwyn T. Williams asserts that there seems to always be fear of a new literary crisis on the horizon for the current generation of students. And yet, he points out, each generation is able to grow into adulthood and keep society functioning, so these fears must be unfounded. Williams argues that “middle class anxieties about status and priveledge” fuel this fear because the middle class is preoccupied with keeping up appearances. Williams argues that the affluent can afford to educate their children and the poor have no voice, so it is the middle class who raise the alarm as they begin to fear that their children will not gain the level of literacy to get into college and find a well-paying job. The type of literacy sought after seems to be mostly regurgitating the Western canon and memorizing static rules of grammar, and dismisses entirely the less traditional communication increasingly required by advancing technology. Williams notes that this idea of literacy is too strict, and that student literacy cannot be judged solely on the grammar displayed in non-traditional writing like instant messaging. Instead students should be taught “that grammar is not a rigid set of rules but a set of conventions that connect identities and status to language”. He hopes that teaching students a broader, more flexible definition of grammar and helping them identify the appropriate writing conventions needed based on their audience will encourage confident, knowledgeable readers and writers.