Featured videos: language, literacy, writing

Reading Together

Perusall logoWe’ll use Perusall to annotate and read together. Link here to Perusall. Instructions for joining on the Assignments page.

Calendar: link here

Above and Beyond: A Rant about Grading, Expectations of Teachers, and the Five Paragraph Essay.

Above and Beyond: A Rant about Grading, Expectations of Teachers, and the Five Paragraph Essay.

Have you ever followed a prompt perfectly? Right down to the very last detail? You have? Well so have I and I usually get B’s on my assignments. One would think if you follow prompts to the smallest detail you would get an A, but that is not how it always works out. I think this form of grading first occurred in my life around middle school and high school, that fuzzy period that all bleeds together into one mass, painful memory. It was when I was first introduced to the five-paragraph essay format. Now, I never was a great writer by any means. I actually always excelled in mathematics and science, but I never found those all too interesting. I was just good at it. The five-paragraph essay really helped me learn to write because it granted me a formula I could follow, like in math, to achieve a clear presentation of my thoughts and arguments. However, there have been many struggles that I have come across during my use of the five paragraph essay that I think go hand in hand with the criticism we read by Wiley.

So, basically, I want to rant about the cruel unfairness of being taught the five paragraph essay in terms of grading and expectations of teachers promoting this form. I remember every time I would question why I would get “B’s” on essays growing up, I would always be told, “You need to go above and beyond the prompt to get an A.” I’ll tell you right now, that is some bullshit school genre writing right there. No job will tell you, “Sorry I know you met your quota this month, but we really need someone that goes above what we are asking you to do. I know we never told you that, and could have put that in our job description, but we assumed you kind of just knew that already.” It is absolutely ridiculous and I will claim this all stems from the use of five-paragraph essay formats: “The primary emphasis on achieving the proper format in the Schaffer method renders content a kind of afterthought”  (Wiley 64). Wiley is arguing that what I am experiencing as a student is directly the cause of the format I was taught to use. The relationship of me being told to follow a structured essay format has forced me to not feel the need to go above and beyond, which I agree with and fully understand, but still think it is hogwash to be expected to go above and beyond.

Into the other drawbacks of this format, I find this format to be very limiting. Having one quote and two lines of commentary on those quotes is hard. Wiley says, “Formulaic writing of the kind Schaffer advocates forces premature closure on complicated interpretive issues and stifles ongoing exploration.” Relating this to the previous quote, Wiley is making an interesting point, which I often have felt. It is hard to for me to just keep writing and stay focused, while a structured essay format keeps me on track: I never know how deep my analysis should be and if it is necessary to pass the assignment. I usually will stick to a few points of evidence and expand only a few points then move on. If I need more material to reach a word count, then I return to these sections and build on the ideas more. These formats usually do not force me to write less, but they give a great argument for me to do less work, which being a lazy student usually trumps my inner “try hard.”

To briefly sum up this rant and expand my thinking on to all of you I have just a few things to add. First of all there are a lot more issues to talk about concerning this structure. While I agree it is a good base for writing and is extremely adaptable to collegiate work, having that being explicitly told to students would help them internalize that this form of writing will not always work and should be expanded upon. This being said, who the hell writes an essay when they don’t have to? So, even this may not solve some of the problems associated with this structure. Secondly, teachers should tell students to go beyond the damn prompt and structure if they expect them to. Why would you just randomly decide to go above and beyond if you don’t have to? I might just be lazy, but I think this is a very big issue. The expectation that students love to write an essay and always want to do better is BS and students shouldn’t be held to that standard. Lastly, I see this formula of five paragraph essays in almost every essay I’ve read in college. They might be more than five paragraphs, and they might have more commentary, but the same principles exist in well received essays. I think as future teachers this is an excellent tool to present students with, but we should let them know it is only one strategy that needs to be built upon to actually serve them any good later in life. Or something like that.

 

2 Replies to “Above and Beyond: A Rant about Grading, Expectations of Teachers, and the Five Paragraph Essay.”

  1. I love this rant. The whole time I was reading it I was thinking about the scene in the movie Office Space about minimum flair: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJtrLKGZZFg You are so right: there is such a contradiction in asking for a formulaic essay that then goes “above and beyond.” They want 37 pieces of flair when the format allows for 10 pieces of flair.

    I wonder how we can create assignments that don’t feel like you are simply performing for the teacher? Because why would you ever go beyond if the writing is not for you or for a purpose and audience outside of the student-teacher relationship?

    great post.

  2. As I went through this blog, the format somewhat jumped out at me as a 5-paragraph essay. But there’s only 4 chunks of ranting here!

    Besides that I agree with Kim that it’s a good rant. Going above and beyond was always something expected of us, but never something that was thrown out to catch the opportunity to be able to do so. So in those terms yes, I liked a lot of the points you pointed out and a lot of them we’re never things I really thought about.

    I feel like I should take some of these here thoughts to help me out with transitioning my writing in some ways. Nice post!

Comments are closed.